I understand that there is a certain logic to having washrooms designated for men and women, but surely that only applies when the facilities in question are designed to be used by more than one person at a time. There are at least two sets of washrooms at Cape Breton University of the sort that can only be used by one person at a time, and yet in both cases, they are designated men's and women's.
Why?
If there's only one person in there at once, what difference does it make who uses which? Worse than that, if there happen to be two men or two women in need at the same time, someone will have to wait while a perfectly good washroom stands empty.
What really bugs me though is that the only explanation for this phenomenon is that whoever is responsible for such things just did not bother to think about it. You have two, then one is men's and one is women's. That's just the way it is.
OK, so it's just a washroom. But it's a small example of a very dangerous principle: things must be the way they are because that is the way they have been.
These are the public versions of the private thoughts of a public intellectual. They are not to be taken as the official position of any group, party, or institution. You may find them boring, confusing, offensive by turn. If you are prone to boredom, confusion, or if you are like to take offense, you may wish to go elsewhere. I welcome comments, but comments that don't respond to what I've actually written or that tell me I'm a jerk will not be posted. Call me names on your own blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment